"I wish we could do it all brick, but to me, the cost is prohibitive."
Village President Tom Cauley said that at a December 2023 board meeting, standing in front of a room full of Sixth Street homeowners who did not want to hear it. Nearly three years later, the question he was answering still doesn't have a final answer, and that unfinished business is exactly why anyone comparing homes in Hinsdale should understand it before they write an offer near Garfield Avenue and County Line Road.
Sixth Street has been brick for four blocks since the 1890s, one of two streets called out by name in Hinsdale's application to add the Robbins Park Subdivision to the National Register of Historic Places. It's the kind of detail that shows up in listing photos and never shows up in a disclosure form. What also doesn't show up in a disclosure form is that the village has spent three years and counting trying to figure out who pays to keep that brick, how much, and whether the answer changes depending on when Congress feels like passing a budget.
If you tracked what a Sixth Street homeowner was told they'd personally owe to preserve the brick, the number moved four times before anyone reached a decision.
| When | What residents were told |
|---|---|
| December 2023 | Village willing to fund $800,000 for brick at intersections only; residents would need to cover an extra $2 million for the full four blocks |
| January 2024 | Proposed Special Service Area could run residents more than $10,000 a year for up to a decade |
| October 2024 | Village formally moves to create the Special Service Area to bridge the funding gap |
| December 2024 | A public hearing reveals a possible $1.1 million federal grant, which would cut the average SSA cost from $7,262 a year to $2,300 a year per parcel |
| January 2025 | Congress fails to pass a 2025 budget; trustees vote to withdraw the SSA rather than finalize a tax district on money that isn't guaranteed |
| February 2026 | The $1.1 million is confirmed and signed into law, but Village President Greg Hart tells Patch that final design details, including materials, still have not been decided |
That last row is the point. This isn't a story about a number that finally settled. It's a story about a number that, based on the most recent public reporting available, is still open.
A Special Service Area is a way for a municipality to raise property taxes on a specific geographic slice of town to pay for something that slice of town wants and the rest of the town doesn't want to subsidize. Hinsdale's proposed SSA for Sixth Street would have done exactly that, and it came with a built-in escape hatch: residents inside the area could kill it by collecting signatures from 51 percent of property owners and taxpayers before it was finalized.
That threshold matters more than it sounds like it should, because the objection window is tied to when the SSA is created, not to when a house on that block changes hands. A current owner who organizes their neighbors can stop it. A buyer who closes after the SSA is already in place inherits the tax with no vote and no petition to sign. Residents who showed up to Village Board meetings in early 2024 understood this well enough to threaten a class-action lawsuit rather than accept the financing plan as written.
Former village trustee Bill Haarlow, who lives on Sixth and now serves on Hinsdale's Historic Preservation Commission, made the irony explicit at a December 2023 board meeting: the village asks homeowners to preserve historically significant houses, he argued, while hesitating to preserve its own historic public asset. His wife Laurel, also a former trustee, pointed out that the village's own National Register application treated the brick streets with the same weight as the architecture. Neighbor Melissa Kinzler, who lives at 218 E. Sixth, called the street a village treasure that belonged to more than the thirty households on it. None of that changed the arithmetic. It just changed who was in the room arguing about it.
The part of this story that surprises people who don't follow local government closely is how much a four-block paving decision in a DuPage County suburb has depended on the U.S. Congress. The $1.1 million grant that reduced the resident burden from $2 million to $900,000 wasn't guaranteed money sitting in a village account. It was contingent on a federal budget passing, and when Congress failed to pass one in early 2025 and settled for a stopgap measure instead, Hinsdale's trustees voted to withdraw the SSA plan entirely rather than lock residents into a tax district built on money that might not show up.
The grant did eventually show up. Village President Greg Hart told Patch in February 2026 that U.S. Rep. Chuy Garcia had confirmed the funding was included in a signed appropriations bill. That's real progress after two years of false starts. But "the money is confirmed" and "the plan is finalized" are two different sentences, and the village had only said the first one out loud as of the most recent reporting we could find, dated March 2026.
If a listing agent shows you a house between Garfield Avenue and County Line Road, historic brick charm is a real selling point and a real open question at the same time. A few things worth asking before you write an offer:
None of these questions have settled answers yet, which is itself useful information. A home on a street with an unresolved municipal financing question isn't a home to avoid. It's a home where the seller, the listing agent, and the village should all be able to tell you the current status in plain terms, because the paper trail on this one is long and public.
We've written before about how Hinsdale's downtown investment pattern tends to move in clusters, new restaurants, station upgrades, and street projects landing in the same stretch of years. Sixth Street is part of that same pattern. The village clearly wants to invest in this corridor. It just hasn't finished deciding who pays for the version residents actually want.
The thing that makes Sixth Street worth understanding isn't really about Sixth Street. It's about what "historic charm" quietly assumes in a town like Hinsdale. A brick street, a landmark tree, a home on the Historically Significant Structures list, these are treated in conversation like settled amenities that add value. What the Sixth Street fight shows is that some of that charm comes with a bill that hasn't been assigned to anyone yet, and the process of assigning it can take years, survive a change in village leadership, and depend on a federal budget cycle nobody on the block controls.
That doesn't make the charm less real. It means the charm and the cost are two separate facts, and a buyer who only prices in the first one is missing half the picture. The people who understand this best are the ones already living on that street, which is exactly why they showed up to three years of board meetings to say so.
If you're weighing a home near Sixth Street, or trying to figure out which Hinsdale pocket actually fits your budget once you account for questions like this one, Second City Agents knows the paper trail on this corridor and the rest of the village. Schedule a free market consultation and we'll walk through what's settled, what's still open, and what it means for your offer.
What is a Special Service Area, in plain terms? It's a defined district where a municipality can raise property taxes on the properties inside it to pay for something specific to that district, in this case, keeping Sixth Street brick instead of paving it. It only applies to the parcels within the boundary, not the whole village.
Is Sixth Street guaranteed to stay brick? No. As of the most recent reporting we could find, Village President Greg Hart said in February 2026 that final design details, including materials, had not been finalized, and a March 2026 update still described the brick-versus-asphalt decision as under negotiation with residents. The $1.1 million in federal funding is confirmed either way.
When will construction actually happen? The project has slipped from an originally planned 2024 start to 2025, then 2026, and the most recent reporting available points to construction anticipated in 2027. Given the project's history of delay, confirm the current timeline with the village before assuming any date is final.